Plano's Political Pitbull
  • Home
  • Posts About Council
  • City Council
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Archives

The City Responds to ALLEGATIONS it is making money off of Water

8/20/2018

7 Comments

 
               On Aug 11th and Aug 13th PPPB posted two articles on Plano's water.  Plano Pocketing Money From Water. (https://planospoliticalpitbull.weebly.com/posts-about-council/plano-pocketing-money-from-water)
and More Water Profits Found. (https://planospoliticalpitbull.weebly.com/posts-about-council/more-water-profits-found)
                       The city has responded to these findings with the following letter.
"Thank you for your questions regarding all the transfers made from the Water & Sewer Fund. I wanted to pass on the response from Willdan & Associates our Rate Model Consultants regarding the transfer to the General Fund and the philosophy behind it.   Willdan completed our Rate Model last November 2017.
“It is unfortunate but not that uncommon that ratepayers sometimes think that municipally-owned water and wastewater utilities such as Plano are making a “profit”.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  The City of Plano only recovers from its ratepayers those revenues required to fund its water and wastewater operating and capital costs.  As is common practice for thousands of utilities across the USA, this cost includes a transfer to the General Fund to reimburse other city departments  (administration, public works, engineering, police/fire, etc.) for the very significant cost each department incurs in providing services to support the utility operation.  If such a transfer were not made, then the General Fund would essentially be subsidizing the water and sewer fund through the provision of costs and services without reimbursement.   The common amount of General Fund transfer for many cities is 10-15% of gross utility revenues, which is precisely where Plano’s General Fund transfer is positioned.  While not all cities make a general fund transfer,  financial and utility professionals across the USA consider these transfers to be prudent financial management and best practices.
           Plano uses the revenues it recovers from its water and wastewater fund to pay operating expenses and make the capital expenditures necessary to ensure that the system operates at an acceptable level of service. Projecting revenues can be inexact, as revenues are dependent on unpredictable weather patterns  (for example, people purchase more water during hot dry months than cool wet months). If in any given year Plano recovers more revenues than all its costs, including its reimbursement of the General Fund, then this additional revenue is simply used for utility capital expenditures.  There are no profits, no stock dividends, and no use of these funds for any purpose other than the provision of water and wastewater service.”
          In addition, the transfer from the Water & Sewer Fund to Capital Maintenance Fund is for two primary purposes:
1. Paying for Pump Station Rehabilitation (replacement of pumps and motors) and Water Design Standard Updates.
2. Paying for facility projects that either tie directly to the utility system (such as roof replacements at lift stations or emergency generator replacements at pump stations) or where utility system personnel have a substantial presence (Parkway Service Center, Municipal Center etc.).
      Our transfer to the Technology Services Fund is to pay for the portion of the staff, operations, and equipment for Technology that is specifically dedicated to Water & Sewer items.
             Let me know if you have additional questions.  
Thanks, Karen [Budget Dircetor] "
           While this letter was meant to answer questions, it only leaves me with more. Why do we need  Consultants Willdan & Associates? How much do we have to pay for them? If transfers to the General Fund only covers operations coasts, why are these costs not listed under water and sewer operations?  What does the department of administration, public works, engineering, police/fire, and others do for water and sewer that they need reimbursement?  What are all the capital expenditures that Plano is spending this money on? Is this all for water and sewer projects? If the money from water and sewer is put into other funds for things related to water, how does the city earmark the money to make sure it only gets spent on water? The simplest way to make sure that water money is only spent on things related to water is for the city to specifically list what every penny of water money is spent on, and why, in the budget. But, of course, that would be too easy and transparent for the government to do. 
This is Plano's Political Pit Bull Signing Off.
7 Comments
MikeH
8/21/2018 07:46:58 pm

Years ago, I majored in Accounting and earned the CPA designation. It's been a long time since my Fund Accounting course for Governmental and Nonprofit, but to the best of my memory, the Budget Director's answer is just so wrong.

The most basic of accounting principles is the matching principle: matching revenues to related expenses, assets and their amortization to liabilities, and the like. What the Budget Director described sounds more like a shell game. I would think Plano Water would have been set up as an Enterprise Fund, which keeps all its revenues, expenses, capital expenditures, and depreciation/amortization within its own financial statements.

There are a bunch of other Budget Director statements that look like misstatements; I don't have the time right now to examine them all. Maybe I should make the time ...

Reply
MikeH
8/21/2018 08:01:53 pm

One thing I neglected to say in my earlier post was that on the other hand, I'm reluctant to say that Plano's Budget Director is stating a blatant falsehood. In my experience, the vast majority of government employees are for the most part ethical and do not engage in official misfeasance or intentionally disregard authoritative guidance.

Reply
Plano's Political Pit Bull
8/22/2018 05:39:06 pm

We have never posted that any specific staff person has done anything wrong or illegal. Staff is only doing what they are told to do. The problem is in the policies that they have to follow. For example lets take the water transfer to the general fund. The policy should be to list each item that money went for. That policy comes form the leadership of City Council. The leadership is the problem.

Reply
MikeH
8/22/2018 07:55:46 pm

Oh, by no means did I mean to imply or assert that PPPB accused such things! My second post was intended to balance MY OWN previous comments, after I realized that I may have used overly harsh language that was virtually accusing City staff of misfeasance. Sorry my language was imprecise!!! I have the highest respect for PPPB. I also appreciate the fact that Budget Director Karen Rhodes-Whitley cared enough to provide a response.

It's just that some of Ms. Rhodes-Whitley's comments don't make sense to me. I would like to ask further questions, and will make myself available to work with others at PPPB if someone would like to go with me and get a better understanding.

Kerry
8/24/2018 08:02:23 pm

So you think City Council hashed out all the minutiae on accounting for water billing? All with the evil intention of "hiding" money or otherwise being less than transparent? That sounds like an accusation to me.

PPPB
8/25/2018 02:18:11 pm

Finally, a comment from Kerry we can post. The city has the accounting information on what they spend the $18 million that they transfer into the general fund. Leadership has chosen to leave it out of the budget. The staff is just following that command. If council wanted to, it could tell the staff to put the information in the budget for all to see.

Reply
PPPB
8/25/2018 03:03:22 pm

MikeH, you are fine. We were just making things to others. The budget director can answer your questions. Her email can be found on the city website.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Posts About Council
  • City Council
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Archives